SessionBoard CE Session Accreditation
VIDEO TRANSCRIPT | Recorded: 2024-06-19 | Verify against current system state
Abstract¶
Question to SessionBoard vendor (Jasmine) about implementing the CE accreditation review process. Focuses on two key requirements: (1) enabling volunteer committee reviewers to access already-approved sessions for CE content review, and (2) providing feedback mechanisms for both educational objectives and presentation files when speakers need to make corrections.
Key Procedures¶
- Assign post-approval review tasks to speakers
- Enable staff NPs to review accreditation materials
- Bring in volunteer committee for 500+ session reviews
- Review educational objectives and presentation files
- Provide back-and-forth feedback on corrections needed
- Track CE hours and pharmacology hours assignment
Notable Statements¶
- 0:00:10 "A process that we have in place that occurs after a session has been approved, but it's a review process"
- 0:00:33 "Accreditation is where we say this session has approved for two CE hours and 1.5 pharm hours of CE content"
- 0:00:52 "We have staff onsite that does the accreditation and approval process"
- 0:00:59 "Once it's accredited, it can be used in our on-demand site or our in-person"
- 0:01:07 "It's a very formal process that nurse practitioners have to review it"
- 0:01:19 "They are very focused on basically these educational objectives... and the presentation files"
- 0:01:42 "It's not only AANP staff that are nurse practitioners... but with over 500 sessions for national, we have to bring in a committee of volunteers"
- 0:02:10 "How do we get reviewers into review things that have already been approved, either some kind of task or a form"
- 0:02:35 "We can have conversations back and forth about specific files. But we would need to do this for educational objectives as well"
- 0:02:53 "I see you've got an advertisement for Bear Asprin in your presentation and you can't have commercial sponsorships"
Systems & Configurations¶
Systems Mentioned¶
- SessionBoard (being evaluated)
- On-demand site (for approved CE content)
CE Credit Types¶
| Type | Example | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| CE Hours | 2 hours | General continuing education |
| Pharm Hours | 1.5 hours | Pharmacology-specific credit |
Reviewer Types¶
| Type | Description | Scale |
|---|---|---|
| Staff NPs | AANP employee nurses | Small team |
| Volunteer Committee | Member NPs | For 500+ sessions |
Review Focus Areas¶
| Area | Issue Examples |
|---|---|
| Educational Objectives | Mismatch with file content |
| Presentation Files | Commercial sponsorship content |
Credentials/Access Mentioned¶
- NP credentials required for review authority
- Volunteer committee access needed
Vendor Contacts Mentioned¶
- Jasmine (SessionBoard contact)
Errors & Troubleshooting¶
No errors - this is a vendor inquiry recording.
Transcript Gaps & Quality Notes¶
- Concise requirements video (4 minutes)
- Related to other CE accreditation recordings
- Conference week timing mentioned
- Two key questions: reviewer access and feedback mechanisms
- Awaiting vendor email response